PROJECT #2000-15
Policy Design of Climate Change Collaboration In Northern Asia: Possible Options and Constraints for Co-operative Efforts between Russia, Japan, China and Korea
| Project Leader |
Dr. Shuzo NISHIOKA
Institute for Global Environmental Strategies
Shonan Village Center, 1560-39, Kamiyamaguchi
Hayama, Kanagawa, 240-0198
JAPAN
Tel: +81-468-55-3700
Fax: +81-468-55-3709
Email: nishioka@iges.or.jp
|
| Funding |
US $60,000
|
| Participating countries |
China, Japan, Korea, Russia
|
Introduction/Background
The main goal of this project is to analyse possibilities and constraints
in developing collaboration between four North Asian countries, i.e. between
China, Japan, Korea and Russia in implementing the Framework Convention
on Climate Change (FCCC); to study national approaches of joint efforts,
strategies and practical steps undertaken and its impacts on other countries
in the Asia-Pacific region; as well as to elaborate policy recommendations
on how to make joint instruments in the region and effective tools on domestic
and international climate policies.
Outline of activities conducted
The first workshop was held on 11-12 October in Hayama. The first day
was devoted to presentations of members research results so far, followed
by discussions. The second day was allocated for structuring an interim
report. Expected contents of the report discussed here included: analysis
of existing regional co-operation in Northeast Asia; implications of co-operation
in the context of UNFCCC and the Kyoto Mechanism; climate policies of the
four countries; economic transition in Russia and its implications on climate
policy; possibilities and barriers of collaboration between Japan and Russia
finding various collaboration in this region including CDM; climate
policy implications of regional energy collaboration; and the introduction
of the GHG emission model for the four countries. Participants were Dr.
Cui Cheng (China), Ms. Zhou (China),
Dr. Shuzo Nishioka, Dr. Naoki Matsuo, Ms. Aki Maruyama, Ms. Wakana
Takahashi, Ms. Miya Iwase (Japan), Dr. Tae Yong Jung (Korea), and Dr. Elena
Nikitina (Russia).
Outcomes/Products
In this research, we recognize the importance of regional collaboration
in Northern Asia in terms of energy and economic collaboration, as well
as collaboration in climate policies. This research is now at the first
draft stage. Objectives and motivation of this research is to analyze possibilities
and constraints in developing collaboration among the four countries (China,
Japan, Korea and Russia) in this region. We focus particularly on national
approaches for the Framework Convention on Climate Change (FCCC), and explore
joint efforts, strategies and practical steps for mitigating GHG emissions
among those countries. First of all, we describe the general situation
of the four countries, developing possible indicators that make a comparison
among them. Since the situations of the four countries are quite different,
it is necessary to have a general description on climate change policy
issues in both domestic and international policies. Especially, it is appropriate
to raise detailed questions related to the Kyoto mechanisms, such as early
action, supplementary technological transfer, additional ties, baseline,
etc. to understand the position of each country to the FCCC.
After the break-up of the former Soviet Union, Russia is now in economic
transition. It has also been identified that institutional modernization
in the energy sector and energy efficiency improvement is the most urgent
task in Russia. However, recently we have observed a turning point in the
economic recovery of Russia, which is important for picturing world GHG
emission profiles. Hence, it is quite critical to identify those new factors
that affect GHG emissions and economic development in Russia.
Another important topic in this research is to identify domestic institutional
and policy formulation between Japan and Russia, since these two countries
belong to the Annex I group of FCCC, who have quantified a target of mitigating
GHG emissions. First of all, institutional barriers for collaboration between
the two countries should be identified. So far, there are 30 existing NEDO
projects between the two countries, which should be further examined in
the perspective of climate policy. Especially, one or two specific projects
under AIJ framework done by NEDO might be good examples.
In a broader perspective, energy collaboration among the four countries
in this region will change the whole profile of GHG emissions, accelerating
energy and economic collaboration. For example, the gas electricity power
plant in Sakhalin for exporting electricity to Japan is now under discussion
between the two countries. Analysis of Siberia's gas pipeline project should
be included, which is attractive to every country in this region. Bilateral
collaboration between countries in this region would also give significant
insight for formulating international collaboration to mitigate GHG emission.
In the case of China and Japan, it is possible to indicate a lot from CDM.
As for China and Korea we can identify many cases for economic collaboration,
but it is difficult to fit them into the Kyoto Protocol at this stage.
In the case of China and Russia, collaboration in the power generation
sector is now in place. (China buys electricity from Russia, which is the
reverse case of CDM.) CDM from Russia to China is theoretically possible
but there is a low probability of such a case. Hence, it is necessary to
analyze specific case studies of various combinations among countries to
derive meaningful climate policy implications.
Future directions/Follow-up work
The second year is devoted to synthesising research results of the
first year into policy recommendations. Based on the analysis of the four
countries political and economic situation, and potential collaborative
options. They include CDMs, development and trade of natural gas use and
development of the emission trade market. The effectiveness of the option
of implementing the Kyoto target and economies of collaborating countries
is quantitatively evaluated by IGEM, an energy-economic model developed
at IGES in the first year. Political implication of collaboration is also
analysed.
|