title title
Japanese |
** HOME **
About APN
Proposals
Activities
Products
Meetings
Links
Calendar
Site Map
HOME > APN Meetings > 9th IGM&SPG > Co-Chars' Summary

Search


Acronyms

Access

Logo

Contact

9th Inter-Governmental Meeting (IGM) & Scientific Planning Group (SPG) Meeting
Full Proceedings of 9th APN IGM&SPG (PDF 8MB)


Co-Chairs' Summary

9th APN Inter-Governmental Meeting and Scientific Planning Group Meeting

22-24 March 2004, Canberra, Australia


Representatives attended the meeting from Australia, Bangladesh, Cambodia , India, Indonesia, Japan, Lao P.D.R., Malaysia, Mongolia, Nepal, New Zealand, Pakistan, Philippines, People's Republic of China, Republic of Korea, Russian Federation, Sri Lanka, Thailand, U.S.A. and Viet Nam. APN Liaison Officers, START and observers from Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries, Queensland Government, Australia; DIVERSITAS; GCOS; IAI; IGBP; IHDP; NIES; University of Adelaide, Australia also participated. The lists of participants are given as Attachments I and II.

 

DAY ONE

IGM and SPG Joint Session


1. Opening

Mr. Howard Bamsey, Chief Executive Officer of the Australian Greenhouse Office, Australia, introduced Honoured Guest Mr. David Borthwick, Secretary of the Department of the Environment and Heritage, Australia, and invited him to make an opening statement.

In his speech, Mr. Borthwick emphasised the sobering impacts of global change and that we are now dealing with extremely complex environmental issues. The need to get a better grasp of factors contributing to global change to respond effectively was also highlighted and the world's response to ozone depletion as reflected in the Montreal Protocol is an outstanding example in achieving long term stability of the ozone layer. Mr. Borthwick stated that a similar response to other global change issues such as climate change is needed. A number of important points were emphasised:

  • Policy needs to be underpinned by sound science;
  • All countries are responsible for global change with the developed countries taking the lead;
  • There remain many uncertainties in climate change, given the complex interactions of natural variability and anthropogenic induced changes;
  • A key strength of APN is the recognition for linking science and policy;
  • Regional collaboration and sharing of knowledge is imperative; and
  • Australia appreciates the activities of APN in dealing with global change.

The APN Secretariat Director, Mr. Sombo T. Yamamura, thanked Mr. Bamsey and Mr. Borthwick for their opening remarks and the Australian Greenhouse Office for hosting the 9 th IGM/SPG Meetings. For their organisational contributions, Mr. Yamamura extended his appreciation to Ms. Melissa Tipping and Drs. Michael Stoddart and Graeme Pearman. The Director stated that this was the first APN Inter-Governmental Meeting (IGM) in the Southern Hemisphere and emphasised the importance of the 9 th APN IGM/SPG meetings, particularly with regard to issues such as:

  • The support from the Japanese Government and its decision to transfer the functions of the APN Secretariat to the Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES);
  • The CAPaBLE Programme;
  • The 10 th Anniversary of APN and its evaluation and second strategic plan; and
  • The streamlining of the meetings and having, for the first time, the national Focal Points and SPG members together in joint sessions.
The APN Director noted his sincere appreciation to all delegates and observers for attending the meetings, which promised to be very productive.


2. Election of Officers

Dr. Michael Stoddart, APN national Focal Point for Australia and Dr. Amir Muhammed, Co-Chair of the Scientific Planning Group (SPG) and SPG member for Pakistan, were elected as Co-Chairs'.


3. Adoption of Agenda

The agenda was adopted as proposed.


4. Review of 2003/2004 Activities

 Mr. Martin Rice, APN Secretariat Programme Manager for Communications and Development, in reviewing the year's accomplishments since the 8th IGM, noted especially:

  • Launching of the CAPaBLE Programme;
  • Initiation of APN's evaluation/review and began preparations for the Second Strategic Plan;
  • Publication of APN's “Initial Synthesis on Land-use and Land-cover Change in Asia and the Pacific;”
  • Initiation of a second APN synthesis on coastal zone management; and
  • Successful participation at the Pacific Island Summit.

In addition to this, APN has continued to enhance its networking activities by disseminating information through the new APN Website; issuing quarterly APN Newsletters, which are also now available in electronic format; distributing the 2003 Activity, Project and Regional Reports publication; and disseminating APN brochures in various languages. Mr. Rice also mentioned that three new brochures were being prepared and would be available for dissemination at various international fora. It was pointed out that a more strategic approach had been taken, in consultation with the Steering Committee, in planning and determining APN's participation in international meetings, workshops, etc. Furthermore, Mr. Rice expressed his appreciation to Dr. Andrew Matthews, SPG Co-Chair and the National Institute for Water and Atmospheric Research (NIWA) for designing and publishing two very professional APN posters: one on APN and its activities in the Pacific Island Countries, and another on APN's capacity building strategies and how they align with capacity building activities of the Earth Observation Summit. For programme development, Mr. Rice highlighted the CAPaBLE Programme, the APN Review/Evaluation and the Second Strategic Plan, and resources development.

The Co-Chair, Dr. Michael Stoddart, remarked that the Secretariat's activities over the year were very satisfying. The Secretariat is encouraged to continue undertaking its activities on behalf of APN in a strategic and professional manner. Mr. Kazuhiko Takemoto, APN national Focal Point for Japan; Mr. Phonechaleun Nonthaxy, APN national Focal Point for Lao P.D.R.; and Mr. Suho Seong, on behalf of the APN national Focal Point for Republic of Korea, spoke of the importance of capacity building activities of APN and the hope that they would continue, particularly through the CAPaBLE Programme.

Action: Secretariat


5. APN Liaison Officers' Annual Reports 2003/2004

The APN Liaison Officers provided overviews of their past year's activities in Oceania[1], South Asia , Southeast Asia and Temperate East Asia. Dr. Amir Muhammed, SPG Co-Chair and SPG member for Pakistan noted that very pleasant developments are taking place in the South Asia region and expects there to be even more regional collaboration in the future. While it was generally recognised that the work of the Liaison Officers is important for networking in the region, it was noted that a number of areas, particularly communication, need to be improved. The following concerns were noted by Dr. Anond Snidvongs, Liaison Officer for Southeast Asia:

  • APN currently has no clear policy on data sharing and a policy needs to be developed;
  • The role and mandate of APN as an Inter-Governmental regional network as well as contribution/commitment from member governments in APN are not clear and not visible in some countries;
  • More interactions are needed between SPG members and national Focal Points; and
  • Quantity and quality of young scientists in the region are alarmingly low. Proposed solutions might be an YSC-type conference at the regional level as well as increased numbers of graduate scholarships.

A member of the Chinese delegation, Mr. Guoushun Sun, raised grave concern about the groupings of the sub-regions used by APN in its reports[2].

The Co-Chair, Dr. Michael Stoddart, thanked the Liaison Officers for their informative reports and pointed out that interaction of science and policy in APN is at the heart of what APN is doing. Science must underpin policy and good science lies at the base of good policy. It was agreed that the effectiveness of activities undertaken by Liaison Officers in their respective regions could be improved and this is an item that needs further discussion at the informal IGM and SPG brainstorming session on day 3 of the Meeting. The Secretariat clarified that Liaison Officers are provided full funding from APN for Liaison Officer activities in their respective areas. New Zealand pointed out that the Secretariat plays the role to serve all APN member countries in the region.

Action: SPG and IGM


6. APN Global Change Coastal Zone Management Synthesis

Professor Nick Harvey, project leader for APN's global change coastal zone management synthesis, gave a detailed presentation on the activities carried out to date and those planned for the coming year. He outlined the rationale and scope of the synthesis, global change in a coastal context, integrated coastal management and global change, the scope of APN-funded coastal research and progress on the synthesis. He emphasized that the products from this activity would include the publication of a book that synthesizes not only APN activities in the region, but all other related activities as well.

He further mentioned that coastal zone activities being carried out in 18 APN member Countries, 5 non-member Countries and 18 Pacific Island Countries were being included in the synthesis. Professor Harvey concluded that the synthesis will foster global change research in the Asia-Pacific region, by identifying research gaps and new directions, and will strengthen links between the science community and policy-makers, through outputs such as a science book and management document.


7. Financial Reports and 2004/2005 Budget

Mr. Yukihiro Imanari, Executive Manager, APN Secretariat, presented the Final 2002/2003 Financial Report for the fiscal year ending March 2003, the Draft 2003/2004 Financial Report and the Budget Plan for 2004/2005.

The IGM approved the reallocation of a small amount of unspent networking funds (US$ 24,000) to cover some unanticipated costs of the budgeted IGM and SPG meetings in the Draft 2003/2004 Financial Report.

The IGM welcomed projected savings on bank charges and reduced overheads that are expected to result from the future Secretariat switch to IGES, thus freeing more funds for APN scientific activities in the region.

All financial items were accepted and adopted.


8. APN Review and Strategic Plan

Mr. Sombo Yamamura provided background information and introduced Mr. Randal Helten, the Consultant charged with conducting the evaluation of APN activities during the first phase (1995-2005) and with preparation of a draft of APN's strategic plan for 2005-2010. Mr. Helten outlined a draft timeline and tasks to be completed in time for the review and for preparation of a draft Second Strategic Plan to be considered and approved at the 10th IGM/SPG Meetings. He emphasized that a 30-page document will be produced, giving a clear understanding of how far the APN has come, and a shared, clear vision for the future. This document will be drafted in consultation with a “blue ribbon panel,” APN members (past and present) and other stakeholders. The IGM/SPG delegates agreed to fully cooperate in this endeavour. 

Action: IGM, SPG, Secretariat and Mr. Randal Helten


9. Proposals and Project Management

 Dr. Linda Stevenson, APN Secretariat Programme Manager for Scientific Affairs, gave an overview of the proposals process and project management in the past year. Dr. Stevenson presented only on the action points from the 8th IGM/SPG Meetings and asked the delegates to read the meeting documents for more detailed information. The following was highlighted:

  • Amendments to the initial award letters and contracts to successful proponents' stating that the award will be submitted in two installments(80:20) and that both final activity, financial reports and review questionnaire must be submitted to APN before the final 20% of the award is remitted;

  • Distribution of pre-proposal questionnaire, compilation and dissemination of the results[3];

  • Success rate of proposals and average award of US$ 45,000 posted on the APN website;
  • Updated External Reviewer Database;
  • External reviews submitted by the Directors of DIVERSITAS, IGBP, IHDP and WCRP;
  • “No-Cost Extension Guidelines” were compiled in consultation with the Steering Committee.

Dr. Stevenson pointed out that all action points had not been completed due to the implementation of the CAPaBLE programme. However, the Steering Committee has agreed to cover these action points with the Secretariat. This will include refining the guidelines for proponents and the guidelines for reviewers. An interactive CDROM will be created to guide both internal and external reviewers in reviewing proposals submitted under the annual Call for Proposals.

The IGM/SPG and the International START Secretariat Director agreed that the APN Secretariat Director should co-sign contracts for APN projects where APN funds are administered by the International START Secretariat according to donor conditions. The suggested revisions to the per diem rates were accepted by the IGM/SPG.

Action: Steering Committee, APN and START Secretariats


IGM Session


10. Membership Development

 The Secretariat reported the tragic death of former APN national Focal Point for the Republic of Korea, Dr. Keum-Hee Jung, former Director, Global Environment Office, Ministry of Environment, and expressed condolences to family members and colleagues. The Secretariat will seek assistance of APN members in finding APN national Focal Points for Nepal and Russia, and SPG members for Bangladesh and Viet Nam. The Secretariat explained that a range of potential organs exist that could represent Pacific Island Countries. The IGM agreed that discussions to find appropriate representation should continue. APN members are to sensitize these organs (such as ASEAN, etc.) to APN and consider potential opportunities for collaboration. Brunei and Singapore are also to be contacted and sensitized to APN activities. Membership development should be considered in the Second Strategic Plan. 

Action: national Focal Points, Secretariat and Mr. Randal Helten


11. Resources Development

The Chair of the Ad Hoc Resources Development Committee, Dr. Michael Stoddart, outlined progress on development of APN's resources and concluded that:

  • It is necessary to analyse, carefully and precisely, APN's role in facilitating research and capacity building in the field of global change;
  • APN is not a body designed to initiate research proposals and to seek external funds to resource them; and
  • There are a number of agencies that fund research in the areas of APN's interest. APN must consider carefully what special “value-adding” the APN would give to an application to one of these bodies that would not be given by another body.

Dr. Stoddart also stated that Secretariat investigations indicate that it was unlikely that the Asian Development Bank (ADB) could be a major funding source for APN. He also emphasised that member country contributions could be “earmarked” for specific activities. The APN also needs to consider leveraging training opportunities, perhaps with organisations such as the Third World Academy of Sciences (TWAS).

The IGM recommended that the Steering Committee continue efforts to find new or additional contributions from member countries, and new funds from external sources such as funding agencies and private corporations.

Action: Steering Committee

 
SPG Session


12. Science Presentations

Science presentations were made on:

- The Pacific Islands Regional GCOS Program
    
Mr. Howard Diamond, GCOS Program Manager, NOAA, U.S.A.

- APN and NIES Collaboration
    
Mr. Takashi Iijima, Executive Director, NIES, Japan


13. 2004/2005 APN Funded Projects

It was announced that the total budget available for APN funded projects would be approximately US$ 760,000, but US$ 22,000 would be set aside as a contingency fund to buffer any substantial fluctuation between Japan and U.S.A. currency exchange rates. Dr. Andrew Matthews, as SPG Co-Chair, presented to the SPG for their approval, the Small Group recommendations for continuing Multi-Year Projects. He emphasised that the recommendations were based on the progress reports, which were compared against the original aims and objectives stated in the project proposals, as well as other supporting evidence from project leaders. He further emphasised that the funding recommended reflected the decrease in budget available for scientific activities under the proposals process.

Dr. Matthews then explained the rationale behind the Small Group recommendations for funding proposals short-listed at Stage 2 of the Proposals Process. The SPG members' ratings for scientific excellence and average score were used as the main basis for the funding recommendations. Other major factors included written reviews by the global change programmes of DIVERSITAS, IGBP, IHDP, START and WCRP, budgetary aspects and regional balance. Dr. Matthews acknowledged APN's appreciation to the four global change programmes and the START International Secretariat for reviewing the proposals.

After some detailed discussion on the proposals being recommended, the SPG agreed on the funding recommendations made by the Small Group as follows:

  • 7 continuing multi-year projects;
  • 10 new projects;
  • 1 project to receive a seed grant[4]; and
  • 1 project to be funded under CAPaBLE.

In addition, 2 proposals were recommended as reserves that would be funded, should additional funding become available. The SPG agreed that these funding recommendations be presented to the IGM for endorsement.

 

DAY TWO


IGM Session


14. Informal Meeting with APN Liaison Officers

Discussions focussed on:

  • Redefining the functions of Liaison Officers so that they can work with APN members in identifying regional priorities and emerging issues;
  • APN considering fellowships to allow young scientists to become more involved in regional research activities;
  • The need for APN projects and data to be integrated into other global change activities;
  • APN Secretariat is to improve overall communications with APN Members; and
  • A hyperlink is to be established in the APN website version of 9th IGM/SPG Co-Chairs' Summary to the Liaison Officer presentations made at the 9th IGM/SPG Meetings.

 Action: Secretariat

DAY THREE


SPG Session


15. Election of Officers

Mr. Sombo Yamamura asked that, as the APN is in an important phase with the approach of its 10th Anniversary, the SPG approve the re-election of Dr. Andrew Matthews as SPG Co-Chair. The SPG accepted this proposal and Dr. Matthews was re-elected as Co-Chair.


16. Other business

In this session:

  • Dr. Andrew Matthews suggested that all seed grant proposals go through the regular proposals process of review. This was accepted.
  • It was proposed that any future symposia should have a human dimensions aspect and IHDP should present on a salient issue. This was accepted.
  • It was suggested that some funds should be reserved for young scientists, should more funding become available. No action was taken.

Action: Secretariat (first 2 bullet points)

 

IGM Session


17. Amendments to APN Framework

The Japanese delegate, Mr. Yasuo Takahashi, explained the change in umbrella of the Secretariat from Association of International Research Initiatives for Environmental Studies (AIRIES) to the Institute for Global Environmental Studies (IGES), as of 1 April, 2004. He outlined the mandate and role of IGES, as an independent non-profit organisation. He also outlined that APN decision-making will be independent from IGES and that APN will maintain and separately manage a special account within the IGES administration. The purpose of this account is to provide flexibility, for example, APN funds can now be carried over from one fiscal year to another.

Furthermore, the APN financial report will be submitted for external audit by an independent body with an international reputation. As a result, APN's status will become more robust with the aforementioned financial, legal and administrative arrangements. Dr. Michael Stoddart, national Focal Point for Australia, explained that the Steering Committee considered the proposed amendments at great length and concluded they are in the best interests of the APN. After discussions with the delegates, the following recommendations to amend the current APN Framework were endorsed by the members:

C. 2 Membership
III. The SC may invite observers to participate in SC activities.

D. 1 Mandate
I. The Secretariat is the principal administrative organ of the APN and is located at the APN Centre, 5F, 1-5-1 IHD Centre Building, 1-5-1 Wakinohama Kaigan Dori, Chuo-ku, Kobe 651-0073, Japan. The Secretariat consists of a Director, appointed by the Ministry of the Environment of Japan, and an appropriate number of staff, and:

a. carries out the day-to-day operations of the network;
b. provides secretariat support to the organs of the APN; and
c. implements IGM decisions.

II. For financial and administrative purposes, the Secretariat operates under administrative arrangements reached between the Secretariat and the Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (hereinafter referred to as IGES).

D. 2 Financial Provisions
The Secretariat will first submit a financial report to IGES*. IGES will incorporate APN's financial report into its Financial Statement and submit it for external audit to an independent body. The Secretariat will then submit an audited APN financial report to the IGM for approval.

*(Footnote)
The APN maintains a special account within the IGES administration. The purpose of this APN special account is to independently administer contributions pledged by member countries and other sources.

Date and Effects of Amendments to the APN Framework
Amendments to the APN Framework must be proposed by a member country or the SC and approved by the IGM. Proposed amendments and supporting documentation must be distributed to member countries no later than two months prior to the IGM at which the proposed amendments are to be considered. All amendments so approved will take effect on the day following the IGM at which these amendments are approved, unless the IGM decides on another date.

Action: Secretariat


IGM and SPG Joint Session


18. CAPaBLE Programme

Dr. Linda Stevenson presented a summary of the CAPaBLE Programme and its activities since the official launch of the Programme in April, 2003 following endorsement by the 8th IGM, and agreement that CAPaBLE should become an integral part of APN's activities. Dr. Stevenson highlighted some of the action points from the 8th IGM and noted the following developments:

  • Formally launched the CAPaBLE Programme, 16 April, 2003;
  • Launched “Call for Proposals” for Comprehensive Research Project (CRP) proposals, established criteria, guidelines and review process;
  • Organised a Programme Development Workshop, May 2003;
  • Selected two 30-month CRPs from twelve proposals; and
  • Selected eight capacity building projects.

A number of delegates raised important questions on the process under CAPaBLE to submit proposals. Dr. Stevenson explained that there would be no further call for proposals for CRPs, but that capacity building activities, in which US$ 80,000 is available for new activities, was an area where national Focal Points and SPG members could suggest activities and submit proposals. It was also emphasised that CAPaBLE is a Programme to build the scientific capacity of developing countries in the region. The CAPaBLE Standing Committee (CSC), which is expected to be fully implemented by end of May, will consider any new proposals that are submitted for funding. The CSC will consist of three SPG members, two mentors to monitor the progress of the CRP projects, and a donor representative from the Ministry of the Environment, Japan. The smaller Capacity Building Committee (CBC), led by Dr. Graeme Pearman, SPG member for Australia, will also consider Capacity Building projects.

Following some discussions on the CAPaBLE process and informing the members of new developments in the programme, the Secretariat emphasised the importance of keeping communications as transparent as possible and asked that all members let the Secretariat know immediately when any national Focal Point or SPG member details are changed. The Secretariat will ensure that all information regarding new developments under CAPaBLE will be informed to national Focal Points and SPG members in a timely manner, particularly on the activities taking place in individual member countries. In addition, all information on the CAPaBLE Programme will continue to be uploaded on the APN website.

For clarification, it was pointed out that the participants who attended the planning workshop attended as experts, and were not officially representing their countries. It was further suggested that members use the networking opportunity back in their respective countries to raise awareness of opportunities available under the programme. It is also important to consider how to disseminate results of CAPaBLE projects to policy-makers. Dr. Andrew Matthews emphasised that the idea of the CRPs was not to create policy papers that circumvent the rights of government, rather it is about fostering research on climate change issues that will be relevant to the Asia-Pacific region, hopefully be of a high standard, and be considered in literature that can be useful in the IPCC and other international processes. CAPaBLE is a different initiative and has quite a different purpose and agenda than the regular call for proposals.

A member of the Thai delegation, Dr. Asdaporn Krairapanond, raised concern that while one of the CRPs being funded under CAPaBLE is quoted as having Thailand involved, this was not the case. The Secretariat is to follow up on this.

It was suggested that if CAPaBLE is indeed an integral part of APN activities as endorsed at the 8th IGM there should, perhaps, be some mention of the composition and functions of CAPaBLE in the APN Framework Document.

It was later explained by the Secretariat Director, Mr. Sombo Yamamura, that when the launch of the CAPaBLE Programme was approved at the 8th IGM in Hanoi, the Secretariat, together with the Steering Committee, was mandated to organise the Programme Development Workshop, select appropriate participants (with capacity building expertise) and discuss the implementation plan of the CAPaBLE programme in its first year. While the Secretariat made every effort to disseminate information on the CAPaBLE programme to APN members, improvements would be made. Mr. Yamamura also noted financial constraints in that FY 2003 funds could not be carried over to FY 2004. He noted that the concerns raised by the delegates in the morning session addressed mainly:

  • The decision-making process in the CAPaBLE programme; and
  • Information sharing.

Mr. Yamamura noted that these comments would be reflected in the Co-Chairs' Summary and that the Secretariat, together with the CSC, would make every effort to communicate all CAPaBLE activities to the APN members and that the CAPaBLE Programme, particularly the selection of new capacity building activities, would be implemented in a more transparent manner.

Action: Secretariat and APN Members


Four presentations on projects currently being funded under CAPaBLE were given:

2003-CB-01: Presented by Dr. A. Snidvongs
Building Capacity of Mekong River Countries to Assess Impacts from Climate Change - Case Study Approach on Assessment of Community Vulnerability and Adaptation to Impact of Climate Change on Water Resources and Food Production

2003-CB-02: Presented by Dr. K. Koshy
Training Institute on Climate and Extreme Events in the Pacific

2003-CB-04: Presented by Dr. H. Meinke
Creating Climate Knowledge Networks through Strategic, Global Linkages

2003-CB-07: Presented by Dr. A. Muhammed
National Capacity Building Workshop in Pakistan on Global Change Research


19. APN Capacity Building Strategies

Dr. Graeme Pearman, SPG member for Australia, opened this session by stating that a lot of the discussions in the past few days had focussed on science and policy interfacing in APN. Dr. Pearman also pointed out that APN needs to focus on what kind of capacity building activities it can support.

Professor Roland Fuchs, Director of the International START Secretariat, was asked to comment on capacity building for APN and made the following comments:

  • START's approach to capacity building has included fellowships; research training workshops; travel grants for conferences; AIACC (Assessments of Impacts and Adaptations to Climate Change) activities; series of Packard Foundation summer institutes on (a) climate variability and food security, (b) urbanization, emissions and the global carbon cycle, (c) vulnerability to global environmental change and other research.
  • Capacity needs are different from country to country, and one size does not fit all needs.
  • Emphasis is placed on research-driven capacity building, enhancing the skills that are needed to contribute to the global change research programmes.
  • START is not adequately addressing the needs of all regions. It employs a competitive application and review process and is aware, for example, that Southeast Asia has not been doing well in that process although the reasons are not entirely clear [e.g. is it science background, language skills, etc.] START needs to better address the needs of some countries that it is not currently serving.
  • APN might want to consider getting input from member countries on what is needed in their countries at the national level.
  • APN might also find it useful to have a compilation of opportunities that are available in the region [e.g. the opportunities available under the JSPS, the Indian Government fellowships, etc.] This information is currently scattered in many countries.
  • Convening a special workshop on how we can better deal with the science-policy interface is a good idea.
  • The new IGBP publication “Global Change and the Earth System: A Planet under Pressure,” could be an excellent resource for capacity building activities.

Dr. Andrew Matthews was then asked to comment on capacity building for APN and made the following comments:

  • Capacity building needs to be driven from a bottom-up approach.
  • We are attempting to attract other donors; therefore we cannot really compete in fellowship programmes that build the capacity of individuals.
  • We should start small and look at programmes that we can afford.
  • Practitioners that need to make the decisions should be trained and thus link more closely to the science-policy linkage.
  • Requested that all members present complete the questionnaire for the Consultant, Mr. Randal Helten.
  • Emphasised the need to establish the dialogue of where we are going and why.
  • APN is not just about climate change.
  • There are a range of other programmes and initiatives that exist (for example, The Japan Society for the Promotion of Science) that support programmes.

Main points of further discussion among delegates included:

  • Few opportunities are available in the region in global change research;
  • There is a lack of financial resources to promote capacity building further in the region;
  • There is a need for member country contributions to further promote capacity building activities in the region;
  • There is a need to build capacity at the local level as well as the regional level in languages that can be understood at the levels required by the countries concerned;
  • A student programme may be worth considering should additional resources become available;

    If APN were to contribute to the cost of students in each country that has identified its needs, and if those funds could be matched with funds from those countries, we could achieve what was envisioned at Johannesburg .
  • The Secretariat should, perhaps, look into what sorts of funds or kinds of schemes could be launched. Perhaps, then, in 12 months we could launch an initiative under CAPaBLE with a large number of countries involved.
  • The need for a layered approach to capacity building, i.e. bottom-up and bottom-down;
  • The duration of a capacity building programme should be driven by the needs of the individual country;
  • A capacity building strategy is needed for policy-makers to understand the science;
  • The need to avoid “brain-drain” should be promoted, perhaps, by encouraging students to serve a minimum number of years in their respective countries, particularly if they are recipients of scholarship funds from APN.
  • APN members need to be kept informed about all APN capacity building activities in their respective countries.

20. Proposed APN Activities

Mr. Sombo Yamamura presented on proposed activities. These were approved by the members present and are listed as follows:

  • World Conference on Disaster Reduction
  • Joint APN and WHO Session: “Climate Calamities and Human Health”
    Climate change is already increasing the frequency and intensity of natural disasters, and to tackle such disasters, a wide variety of knowledge, wisdom and resources needs to be mobilized and effectively integrated. With this in mind, institutions and centres in Kobe formed a Disaster Reduction Alliance (DRA) in 2003 with a goal to synergize international cooperation towards disaster reduction. From 18-22 January 2005 the World Conference on Disaster Reduction (WCDR) will convene in Kobe, and as part of a DRA initiative, APN and WHO Centre for Health Development are seeking IGM approval for a joint session at the WCDR.
  • APN's Poster Presentation at GEO-4 in Tokyo
    The 8th Steering Committee meeting highlighted recent movements regarding GEO, as APN was highlighted at the GEO-2, held in November 2003, as an organisation who could be involved with GEO in terms of its capacity building component. GEO stands for the inter-governmental ad hoc Group on Earth Observations and it was established as a result of the First Earth Observation Summit, held in Washington DC in July 2003. They have had intensive discussions to develop a conceptual framework and a 10-year Implementation Plan for building a comprehensive, coordinated, and sustained Earth observation system of systems aiming at its completion in late 2004. The APN Steering Committee recommended that APN can also be aligned with the GEO programme in terms of the training and capacity building component of the GEO programme (e.g. CAPaBLE exactly fits into the GEO agenda). The APN Secretariat in collaboration with NIWA, New Zealand , is preparing a poster that focuses on some APN activities that specifically fit the GEO agenda. Dr. Andrew Matthews, SPG Co-Chair, and the APN Secretariat will participate in the side event in Tokyo, as they had done similarly at the Pacific Island Summit in May 2003. This was acknowledged by the IGM/SPG as a positive role for APN in the GEO process.

Action: Secretariat


21. Other Business

Mr. Sombo Yamamura presented information on an internship opportunity at the APN Secretariat. Mr. Yamamura explained that as part of APN's Capacity Building efforts, the APN  is posting an Internship vacancy announcement for a highly motivated young professional, with an interest in global environmental issues, willing to work in an international environment. The objective is to provide an opportunity for a young professional to gain invaluable work experience with an inter-governmental global change research network over a 9-month period. This will also assist the Secretariat in coping with its increased workload. This was welcomed and approved.

Action: Secretariat


22. Informal IGM and SPG Brain Storming Session

This discussion that took place was very fruitful and the main points discussed are to be collated and disseminated to members. The members were fully encouraged to contact the Secretariat or Consultant, Randal Helten, with any additional information.

Action: national Focal Points and SPG Members

 

IGM Session


23. Scientific Planning Group Report and 2004/2005 APN Funded Activities

On behalf of the SPG, Dr. Andrew Matthews explained that the total budget available for APN funded projects would be approximately US$ 760,000, but that US$ 22,000 would be set aside as a contingency fund to buffer any substantial fluctuation between Japan and U.S.A. currency exchange rates. Dr. Matthews presented to the IGM for their approval of the SPG recommendations for continuing Multi-Year Projects. He emphasised that the recommendations were based on the progress reports, which were compared against the original aims and objectives stated in the project proposals, as well as other supporting evidence from project leaders. He further emphasised that the funding recommended reflected the decrease in budget available for scientific activities under the proposals process.

Dr. Matthews then explained the rationale behind the recommendations for funding proposals short-listed at Stage 2 of the Proposals Process. The SPG members' ratings for scientific excellence and average score were used as the main basis for the funding recommendations. Other major factors included written reviews by the global change programmes of DIVERSITAS, IGBP, IHDP, START and WCRP, budgetary aspects and regional balance. Dr. Matthews acknowledged APN's appreciation to the four global change programmes and the START International Secretariat for reviewing the proposals.

After some detailed discussion on the proposals being recommended, as well as the system used for scoring and ranking the proposals, the IGM agreed on the funding recommendations made by the SPG as follows:

  • 7 continuing multi-year projects;
  • 10 new projects;
  • 1 project to receive a seed grant[5];
  • 1 project to be funded under CAPaBLE.

The list of projects is available as Attachment III.

Mr. Louis Brown, APN national Focal Point for the U.S.A., noted that five out of seven continuing multi-year projects and seven out of the twelve new projects that have been approved for funding have significant focus on the human dimensions of global change. The Secretariat is to assure that the IHDP be informed on this point.

It was further pointed out that:

  • All funding levels will be negotiated with the Principal Investigators and in the negotiations, a number of conditions for travel grant projects in particular will apply, such as:
    1. The selection process for awarding recipients of APN travel funds must be open and transparent;
    2. Selected candidates must meet and interact with each other at the meeting; and
    3. Selected candidates must have a pro-active role, i.e., not simply be observing in the meetings but actively be engaged in poster and/or presentation sessions.

Action: Secretariat


IGM and SPG Joint Session


24. Date and Venue of Next IGM/SPG

As APN will celebrate its 10th Anniversary at the next IGM/SPG meetings, the Japanese delegation offered to host the meeting in Kobe, Japan on 12-14 April, 2005. Mr. Kazuhiko Takemoto, national Focal Point for Japan , expressed his desire that all members come to Japan to celebrate the 10th Anniversary of APN. The Co-Chair, Dr. Michael Stoddart thanked Japan for their kind invitation, which was accepted by acclamation. Mr. Yamamura then discussed some of the logistical details about the meeting, including the dates of the meetings and the venue location. The APN members expressed their full appreciation of the generous offer to invite all delegates to Japan next year to celebrate the 10th Anniversary of the APN at the 10th IGM/SPG Meetings.


25. IGM/SPG Co-Chairs' Summary

The Co-Chair, Dr. Michael Stoddart, invited the Secretariat Director to make his closing remarks. The Director. Mr. Sombo Yamamura, thanked all participants, Co-Chairs, Drs. Amir Muhammed and Michael Stoddart, and informed the IGM that a Steering Committee will be held following the IGM to discuss the most effective implementation of the decisions taken. Mr. Yamamura also highlighted that this year's joint IGM/SPG meeting will strengthen interactions among scientists and policy-makers. He also stressed that we also need to fully utilise the human network of APN members and project scientists (past and present) as a tool to keep abreast of global change research developments. The IGM/SPG expressed its sincere appreciation to the Australia Greenhouse Office for the excellent arrangements for this 9th Inter-Governmental Meeting and Scientific Planning Group Meeting. The Secretariat was also thanked for its efforts during the past year.


[1] Dr. Kanayathu Koshy, SPG Member, gave the Liaison Officer Report for Oceania .
[2] To date APN has been using the sub-groupings of START. APN makes no further subdivisions of the Asia-Pacific region.
[3] The results indicate that the pre-proposals stage is effective, particularly in strengthening proposals.
[4] The recipient of this seed grant will submit a new proposal to be reviewed together with all other proposals received in the 2004 Call for Proposals.
[5] The recipient of this seed grant will submit a new proposal to be reviewed together with all other proposals received in the 2004 Call for Proposals.

[ To Top of Page ]